Sample Reports
This page shows the delivered screens in their real structure and reading order. The numbers are filled only with your own measured data — request a free AI visibility check and the same format comes back filled with your brand's live evidence.
One Panorama asks 50 questions of 15 engines, 7 times each — 5,250 cells in all, read across the 17 places an answer can show your brand.
What an unseen deliverable costs. If you cannot inspect the report before buying, you risk discovering its limits in the meeting where somebody asks how a figure was produced. Every screen below is filled from a sealed CiteAngle reading with competitors read side by side with your brand, which is why the format can be argued with.
The second cost shows up at renewal. Without seeing the format first you risk buying a report your own team cannot use: no denominators to answer finance, no source URLs for the people who have to fix the pages, and nothing an analyst can recompute. A deliverable that stops at the score is a deliverable that gets read once.
Because the deliverable is the product. Everything else in this category is a promise about a deliverable, and the two are only the same thing if you have seen it. A report you cannot inspect in advance is a report you find out about after the invoice, usually in the meeting where somebody asks how a figure was produced and the answer is a shrug.
What is worth looking for while you scroll is what these screens do with uncertainty. A rate appears with the interval around it, never as one confident number. A verdict sits next to the evidence that produced it and the action it implies. Competitors are read inside the same answers, on the same questions, in the same runs, so what you see is a position on a field. And readings the grid planned but could not take are printed as a count instead of disappearing, because a denominator that quietly shrinks makes every rate above it look better.
Hold a vendor dashboard next to this and the difference is not the styling. It is whether the screen can be argued with.
The delivered screens, in their real reading order — filled only by your own measured evidence.
50
buyer questions in the delivered Panorama grid — each one put to all 17 places a US answer can name you, 7 separate times, with every run's status shown
Product specification · sources on the claims registry
7
repeated runs behind every rate on these screens — answer variation captured, not guessed
Wilson score 95% confidence intervals on applicable citation rates
15
slides in the executive brief — the artifact that reaches the decision table
Included with Panorama · delivered async
The current Panorama asks all 50 buyer questions seven times over, everywhere on our US list. Every reading gets a status: observed, cited, failed or indeterminate. Below is an edited view of the report screens — the CiteAngle index gauge, per-engine visibility and the query×engine matrix. The full deliverable is written from your own measured evidence.
The ladder in one line: Radar ($399) compresses the same 17-surface panel into 5 questions, still asked seven times each; Compass ($1,199) widens to 20 questions; Panorama ($2,599) runs all 50 and reports Wilson score 95% confidence intervals, because a rate without its range cannot be compared with anything; Wide-Angle Panorama ($3,899) runs that same grid and reads thirty competitors inside the answers instead of ten. Paid audits can attach Wide Pack (+10 buyer questions at the same depth) or Focus (core-10 precision to 28 or 40 cumulative runs), deliver one to three business days after measurement starts, and carry Panorama's async expert layer — an expert-written narrative, the 15-slide executive brief and email Q&A with a two-business-day written response. Every screen below is the delivered format.
Vertical — Do you appear?Top yes · bottom no
Horizontal — Does a rival appear?← No · Yes →
The layout above carries the report's real components in their real structure. Your report is filled only with verified observations and source URLs.
What the report shows — the same question draws different answers from different engines. A brand cited on one engine routinely fails to appear on another. On top of that read, the report connects the landscape of sources the AI actually cited, the queries you win and the queries you concede, and the co-cited source candidates inside answers your competitors currently own. Each source candidate is presented in verification order — answer sentence, citation marker, URL, source page — so the decision on which engine and which query to move first starts from measurement.
The full Panorama report is checked against a completeness manifest, so no deliverable goes missing. The headline sections:
On top sits the expert layer, delivered entirely in writing: an expert-written narrative with graded prescriptions, the 15-slide executive brief, plus email Q&A with a two-business-day written response.
The real report — citation gaps, win/loss queries, contested zones — is written from your data and delivered to you alone. The fastest way to see it on your own brand is a free AI visibility check and a Panorama at its listed price. What we measure for you goes to you and to no one else.
The colors are judgment stages, not decoration.
The report's colors are judgment stages, not decoration. Each card states what was detected to produce the verdict, which observations entered the denominator, and the next action it points to.
Observations where the brand entity or a registered owned URL was confirmed inside a valid answer. Open the receipts by engine, query and run to trace exactly which answers produced the strength.
Reading order · valid denominator → mention/citation counts → confidence interval → source URLs
The answer came back clean, but your brand was not selected — or was mentioned without your URL being cited. We split the search-candidate, AI-selection and brand-binding stages so the fix lands at the right layer.
Reading order · search presence → AI mention → source citation → answer absorption
Brand absence and collection status are separated, so only real improvement signals enter the priority list. Recollected observations go to the work queue; the valid ones become comparison metrics.
Reading order · status label → denominator inclusion → recollection / review record
With the regional extension, executives read the national coordinates and the priority states on one screen, while operators drill into the evidence — regional AI answers, mentions, direct citations, search presence and competitive gaps — observed under verified regional access and location signals. Below is the structure of the delivered screen; your report carries only verified observations and source URLs.
The national query panel summarizes mention, direct citation, search presence and competitive position. State observations are never pooled in to inflate the national figure.
United States national panel
US regional visibility map
Extension · Regional units: 50 states + Washington, DC
The regional panel is a quote-based option scoped by coverage. Explicit location APIs and verified regional browser observation are kept separate, and IP-derived coarse location and opt-in precise device location run as independent panels. Location receipts, surfaces, queries and run counts are fixed before contract, and state figures are reported on their own denominator next to the national baseline. A single reference-city observation remains a result for that location only; only panels that meet contracted multi-location coverage and acceptance gates are promoted to state or DC scores.
Operators get the data. The board gets fifteen slides.
The data report belongs to your operators; decision-makers need fifteen slides. The executive brief included with Panorama is that artifact — a 15-slide deck carrying the three-line verdict and the priority targets, structured like this:
The panels above show representative slides from the fifteen, edited. The real deck is written from your measured data and arrives boardroom-ready — read it on your own schedule.
Same engines, same judging rules — what changes is scale, the competitor panel, the expert layer and the brief.
The charts looking alike is deliberate — all four measure with the same engines and the same judging rules. What separates them is measurement at a scale that yields statistics, how many competitors are read inside the same answers, the expert layer (sections an expert writes personally), and the executive brief. Compass is the automated audit that fixes your precise current coordinates from a full measurement grid; Panorama is the complete audit that adds the expert layer and the executive briefing; Wide-Angle Panorama runs that same grid and widens the competitor panel from ten companies to thirty. The cards settle it.
Start free
Free · same day
Coordinates audit
$1,199 · one-time
Flagship
$2,599 · one-time
Widest panel
$3,899 · one-time
Audit credit — Within thirty days of payment, the full audit fee comes off your first program payment · either implementation sprint, Growth Operations or Category Leadership.
The free AI visibility check runs on your own brand — which makes it more accurate than any demo. Request it from the contact page and the format on this page comes back with your live evidence.
For the format we use to write results up as evidence — use case, measurement design, numbers with their window, and an explicit scope label — see how we document results as evidence.
Radar $399 compresses the same 17-place panel into 5 questions, still asked seven times each, as a presence check, and paid audits can attach Wide Pack $799 (+10 buyer questions at the same depth) or Focus (core-10 precision to 28 or 40 cumulative runs, $1,799/$2,499) — see the full list.
Get the decision map — Panorama $2,599 Fix your coordinates — Compass $1,199 Get your free AI visibility checkReady to turn US visibility evidence into a market plan? Tell us the US buyer, target state and decision date.
Request a written proposal