Version v1 · updated 2026-07-23 · free to cite with attribution — every row in the JSON carries a link to the page where the figure was first published.
Law firms (KR) — mention and citation across 6 AI answer surfaces
Window 2026-07-16 ~ 2026-07-17 KST. 9 brands × 6 surfaces, 10 queries × 7 repeats.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Valid mention observations | 393 |
| Surfaces with a leading brand present | 6 of 6 |
| Leader mention-rate range by surface | 27~69% |
| Median roster mention rate, range by surface | 0.0~47.1% |
| Same-brand mention-rate spread across surfaces | max 68.6% / min 2.9% |
| Same-brand citation-rate spread across surfaces | max 21.4% / min 2.9% |
| Brands in the top band on every surface | 1 of 9 |
| Brand × surface cells with zero citations | 28 of 54 |
| High-mention, zero-citation case | mention 44.3% · citations 0 of 70 |
| Surface | Valid runs |
|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 70 |
| Claude | 70 |
| Perplexity | 70 |
| Grok | 70 |
| NAVER AI Briefing | 70 |
| Google AI Mode | 43 |
The 27 Google AI Mode runs where no AI answer was displayed are excluded from the denominator and disclosed as a count. Denominators differ per surface, so rates are never pooled.
Clinics (KR) — same grid, a different picture
Window 2026-07-16 ~ 2026-07-17 KST. Same design as the law-firm grid.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Median roster mention rate, range by surface | 0.0~1.4% |
| Best-placed clinic, queries with presence | 3 of 10 |
| Clinics never mentioned at all | 5 of 9 |
| Valid-run denominator — ChatGPT | 70 |
| Valid-run denominator — Claude | 70 |
| Valid-run denominator — Perplexity | 70 |
| Valid-run denominator — Grok | 70 |
| Valid-run denominator — NAVER AI Briefing | 70 |
| Valid-run denominator — Google AI Mode | 53 |
NAVER AI Briefing t0 — the pre-advertising baseline
Measured 2026-07-16. A 50-query panel (commercial 32 · informational 13 · branded 5) × 7 repeats: 350 runs, 343 valid observations. NAVER is the surface most non-Korean tools skip — which is exactly why this baseline is worth having on record.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| AI Briefing displayed | 343 of 343 (100%) |
| Unique cited domains | 91 |
| Panel brands mentioned in answer bodies | 3 of 9 |
| Ad elements detected (our judgment criteria) | 0 of 343 |
| Domain | Appearances | Share |
|---|---|---|
| blog.naver.com | 151 | 44.0% |
| i-boss.co.kr | 78 | 22.7% |
| ranketai.com | 42 | 12.2% |
| developers.google.com | 38 | 11.1% |
| openads.co.kr | 35 | 10.2% |
| namu.wiki | 28 | 8.2% |
| ai.idearabbit.co.kr | 25 | 7.3% |
| aeocheck.co.kr | 21 | 6.1% |
| mepix.ai | 21 | 6.1% |
| zestcompany.co.kr | 19 | 5.5% |
Google AI Overviews — observed in Korea
Measured 2026-07-12. 50 queries × 14 observations each, 700 observations total.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| AIO trigger rate | 96.0% (49 of 50 queries) |
| Brand mentioned in answer body | 41.5% |
| Cited as a source | 9.6% |
Sources
Every figure above was first published on one of these pages. When you cite the dataset, please cite the original page as well.
- AI 가시성 인덱스 — 로펌(KR) · 2026년 8월호(제1호) published 2026-07-17
- AI 가시성 인덱스 — 피부·성형 클리닉(KR) · 2026년 8월호(제1호) published 2026-07-17
- 같은 질문, 여섯 개의 다른 답 — 로펌 업종 AI 검색 실측 published 2026-07-10
- 로펌 AI 가시성 리더보드 1호 — 전통 서열과 다른 순위표 published 2026-07-10
- 피부·성형 클리닉 AI 가시성 리더보드 2호 — 아직 주인이 없는 시장 published 2026-07-11
- 언급과 인용은 다른 사건 — AI 가시성 리포트가 세는 것의 판정 기준 published 2026-07-17
- 광고가 들어오기 전, 네이버 AI브리핑은 지금 누구를 인용하는가 published 2026-07-16
- 구글 AI 요약(AIO), 한국에서 이미 켜져 있습니다 — 50개 질의 중 49개 실측 published 2026-07-12
- 측정 방법론
- 공개 클레임 레지스트리
How to cite
Suggested form: CiteAngle, "Open Aggregates: AI Answer-Surface Visibility, v1 (2026-07)", citeangle.com — with a link to the original page. Aggregates are free to redistribute; the underlying sealed run artifacts, query panels and judgment configurations are not part of the release.
Want your own brand measured on a grid like this? Start with the free visibility check.